- Fighting for Peace with Justice -
| Argentina - On the Edge of the Abyss |
|
| Bulletin archive - Bulletin Issue3 October?December 2001 | |||
| Tuesday, 09 September 2008 13:21 | |||
|
In the first of a three part series on Argentina, we examine the country's economic nightmare as it presents itself to government policy makers, a set of impossible choices. Part II will look at the potential of an Argentine economic collapse to destabilise world markets and create a new political crisis for George W. Bush's war administration, and Part III will report on the resistance movement in Argentina.
The Open Veins of Latin America… To zero the deficit, the government decreed an immediate 13 per cent cut in public sector wages and pensions. Across the country public and private employers, unable to pay the reduced wages, are closing down and throwing thousands into unemployment. Others are paying their workers with IOUs. The savage austerity measures provoked a furious response: “Protestors and unionists in Argentina blocked highways, shut banks, university faculties and government offices and marched on congress yesterday… tens of thousands of state workers in the capital and regional centres are protesting against proposed 13 per cent cuts in some salaries and pensions… The backlash to the austerity effort has unnerved foreign and local investors, who fear social unrest will hold up implementation of the measures". A few days later, the Financial Times warned “Even if the executive does push through the latest austerity measures, the social backlash and reduced spending power… will do nothing to break the vicious cycle of high interest payments and zero economic growth, which is strangling the country.” The threat of devaluation Why are Argentina’s capitalists so keen to maintain the dollar peg? Until the past few months, no force within bourgeois politics has questioned the peg since it was put in place in 1991. Even though the peg signified the formal surrender of Argentina’s economic sovereignty, the idea that one peso was worth one dollar was a source of pride. But, with its pegged currency, Argentina has become more and more uncompetitive with each devaluation of a rival’s currency. The peg is now blamed for the severity of Argentina’s three-year recession; the strongest evidence that devaluation is inevitable and near is the debate that now rages within Argentina on whether to undo the peg. The ten year-old “hard peg” was supposed to shield foreign capitalists investing in Argentina from all currency risk – the risk that a devaluation of the peso would decimate their investments. It made it impossible for Argentina’s government to print money, and was therefore credited with ending hyperinflation, which, at one point in the late 1980s, reached 17,000 per cent. However, the lenders of loan capital never really believed in the permanence of the hard peg, which is why peso loans always came with a much higher interest rate than loans of dollars. But borrowers tended to be more trusting, and so they ignored currency risk and took out their loans in dollars. This is why a devaluation of Argentina’s peso would be catastrophic, bankrupting all those whose income and assets are in pesos but whose debts are in dollars. This is why Argentina’s capitalist government shrinks from doing what Mexico did in 1994 – devalue its currency, thereby boosting exports while causing imports to shrink. Sharply lower real wages and lower asset prices would then induce private capital to rush back, into a poorer, more export-oriented country. Analysts disagree about how much the peso will fall when the inevitable happens. The rush to buy dollars for debt-servicing could cause it to decline by 80 per cent. Argentina’s capitalists are terrified. Many have got out while they can, in effect forcing the IMF to finance flight capital. Some wealthy Argentineans remain major lenders to the government, expressing not patriotism but greed for the risk premiums to be extracted from their compatriots . The smartest have exported their capital to London or Madrid or New York, and then reinvested it via a US or Spanish bank. They are much more likely to get any bail-out money that’s going. John Smith
|